“Mama There Goes That Meme!” Ep. 7: Contraction Traction, What’s Your Action?

“Mama there goes that Meme!” is a weekly HoopSpeak feature in which Beckley Mason and Ethan Sherwood Strauss, like curious extraterrestrials, probe, abuse, and ultimately learn from a popular media meme.

——

“I don’t know that there will be contraction, but I just don’t want to say anything that denies that that subject gets raised.”– David Stern

Ethan: Obviously today’s meme is about how crazy that statement is. Right, Beckley? Isn’t that just, totally nuts?

Beckley: Yeah man, I can’t get enough of the Pistons! More teams! Wooo!

Ethan: Uh oh. Dude, you’re not saying that—

Beckley: …Listen we both know there are too many teams. Don’t hang me out to dry now, you’re the one who noted that despite the Pistons’ Pontiac-level suckery, they still get better TV ratings than the Thunder…

Ethan: Dude! Stop! Don’t do it, man! Put DOWN STERN’S LOCKOUT BEARD!

Mark Jackson: Beckley, you’re an amateur bloggah of 8 months, you’re a fan who’s lost his team…YOU’RE BETTER THAN THAT!

Beckley: I’m not answering to you, Mark, until you answer the hundreds of tear-stained letters I’ve sent you! (Just want to say I loved you on The B.S. Report… call me!)

Ethan:
Get a grip, man! We’ve already alienated big market readers with our Kobe-bashing.

Beckley: Okay, Okay, I think it’s possible to semi-rationally discuss the ready benefits of contraction… call it the SternVaders’ Advocate. We’ve already heard why contraction is a bad idea. Now give yourself to the Dark Side, Ethan. It is the only way you can save your League…. Yessss, your thoughts betray you…Your feelings on contraction are strong.

Ethan: You’re advocating for small towners to suffer the sad Sonics fate. Like Blackwater, you’ve become an evil contractor…a monster, a fat cat, an oligarch…

Beckley: I don’t know about that small market jibba-jabba. Seattle remains a bigger market than 60% of the League–we’re just out West and not in California so no one cares–but that’s a conversation for another day. I will, however, admit that The Relocation did alter my perspective because I now view the NBA from a non-partisan perch. I just want to see good basketball, ie- not the Pistons, not the Pacers, not the Wolves. Before you jump to conclusions, know that I don’t want there to be fewer guys rewarded for putting their entire lives into getting to the League, I actually think there should be more professional ballers–just fewer NBA teams.

If I were Commish for a day, I’d make the Development League a real minor league system with one D-Leag team for each NBA team. There are currently 16 D-League Squads and 30 NBA teams, what if there were 26 of each? That would give us six more professional teams total, employing another 80 or so players, while pruning teams or cities without enough talent or interest to warrant an NBA team, like Memphis. Yes, I know there would be a couple divisions with an extra team, but let’s ignore logistics for this hypothetical. With fewer NBA teams, you would need to cut the playoffs down to six teams from each conference–something like the NFL playoff bye system. A decrease in the number of teams and top paying jobs would go over with players and owners about as well as  Joel Anthony’s insistence that LeBron “feed him the rock.” But, coupled with a stronger development league, it would increase the level of play. That’s different than simply casting cities out of the league, which, in my opinion, is a solution only the dark and mighty Lord Cthulhu would desire.

(Beckley starts undulating Stern’s lockout beard like a pendulum. Ethan’s eyes spin and spiral.)

Ethan: Screw it, you’ve turned me, there’s too much basketball improving incentive. I’m for eating teams, if it means better NBA consumption. Even a kind shark can’t resist the current-carried blood. Speaking of which, my father once penned a script for “Sharkula,” back in the 70’s.The plot: Shape-shifting Venus shark monsters disguise themselves as returning USA astronauts, only to gobble gullible humans. There’s a character named, “Discozilla.” Again, it was the 70’s. My point is, some innovations don’t translate across generations. The NBA in Charlotte, Memphis and New Orleans might be a Discozillas–ideas that retrospect hates. Shades on, rhinestone, strobe light, Mothra fight. The goal of contraction should be to serve man.

And I like the D-League idea. Let them eat D-League if they can’t support The League. It’s a kinder, gentler way to kill teams. Beckley, you’ve really threaded the lethal injection needle there.

Beckley: How your Dad kept the lid on the spacecandy-laced adventures of Sharkula and Discozilla all these years I’ll never know. So do the Sharkula(s?) walk around? Are they clothed? Can they boogie? Is this just more Sharksploitation cinema?

Also, I notice all the cities that you single out for contraction are in the South. Yet no one goes to 76ers games, even when they make the playoffs… Do you have some criteria other than apathy, or is this just some time-honored, Berkley-bred South bashing?

Ethan: This is fraught territory, I have to discuss race in the NBA and how it relates to American politics. I feel like Edward Scissors Hands, juggling Fabergé eggs, as Sharkulas nip my gonads. Well, first off I’d cite Princeton political scientist Larry Bartels (by way of Paul Krugman), who made the case that white men as a whole have not fled the post-1960′s Democratic party: The demographic’s donkey departure is confined to the regional South.

Tremble before Krugthulhu!

Regardless of how you feel about Red vs. Blue, Democratic civil rights support was the major propulsion behind this Southern political shift. And it leaves us with an odd situation where disproportionately black states vote against the Democrats, whom black people tend to vote for.

Contrary to popular urban myth, the majority of poor white Southerners don’t vote Republican–upper Southern classes overwhelmingly do, enough to swing elections. And the middle-to-upper classes comprise a great percentage of a team’s viewership, and an even greater percentage of its attendance base. My uncle used to say “Vote with your feet, vote with your wallet.” Buy an NBA ticket and you’re making an unconscious social statement about who you are and how you likely vote:

Perhaps politics and race have nothing to do with hoop in this modern era of African American presidential leadership. But, “bad” basketball towns mostly exist in a certain region. The Grizzlies, Bobcats and Hornets often wither on death watch. The Hawks have had team success amid numbing local apathy.

This issue is more complex than “racism.” Tradition, tribal identity, and subconscious thought patterns are involved. But it shouldn’t shock us that a league constantly at war with unfair depictions of “thugs” and “gangsters,” finds ears deafest below the Mason-Dixon portal. As for Philly, I don’t know. Philadelphia does have something in common with Memphis, New Orleans and Atlanta, though: African Americans make up the city’s largest ethnic group. And that’s the sound of a Sharkula sinking his teeth into my inner thigh.

Last thing I want to know before cold death sweeps my soul into oblivion: Why no D-League teams reside in the dozen or so states that comprise America’s Southeast corner?

Beckley: While I bow to your academic insight into NBA patronage patterns, I don’t think there’s rhyme nor reason to the league that includes the Maine Red Claws, Fort Wayne Mad Ants, Albuquerque Baleful Coyotes, and Erie Bayhawks–can you guess which one I made up? My guess is that if Chris Paul doesn’t inspire attendance, folks aren’t going to be rarin’ for Rashad McCants.

I still contend that The Development League remains a major opportunity for the NBA. Currently, the Mavericks, Thunder, Spurs, Rockets are the only teams with their own D-League squads– which means that only those teams can completely control player development at that level. Is it any surprise that these are four of the healthiest, best-managed franchises in the league?

Every team should be developing young players for a couple of reasons. For one, it increases the depth and institutional knowledge within your franchise while giving coaches an opportunity to cut their teeth and experiment with strategy. Player injuries issues could be more cheaply mitigated by pros who are already “in your system.” But more importantly, this is an opportunity to develop assets for relatively cheap. If you invest $95K/yr in an undrafted player and are able to increase his market value so that he can be traded or bought by another team you are getting a great return on that asset. This is how small market English Premier League teams remain profitable, by developing major talent through the minor league system. While the EPL is not a model of parity, that’s more because English teams import a large percentage of the league’s top talent. For the NBA, top notch player development programs across the D-League would allow smaller market teams to remain competitive by growing cheap young talent through the “farm system” instead of relying solely on hitting draft day home runs and overpaying free agents.

But not only could an expanded Developmental League be an essential part of every franchise, it would result in better players playing better basketball. I’m no Krugthulhu, but I know there’s a strong relationship between the quality of the product and the health of the league. I suppose the main risks would be the perception of contraction as a sign of league-wide weakness (although Stern is already doing his best to promote that), and the millions of hearts broken by franchise demotions. But in 20 years, would it be the best thing for the league?

Henry Abbott: Hey Beckley and Ethan, I’ve got some bad news. You guys have been putting a lot into this I know (or hope), but the harsh reality is that we over-expanded the TrueHoop Network and at this point it’s kind of a “last in, first out” situation. As HoopSpeak was the latest blog to be added to the network, it falls to me to tell you your time with TrueHoop is up. Also, people weren’t really attending your blog at the rates we find sustainable. I think you’ll find that, over the long term, this is the best thing for the Network. For now, I would recommend trying to get on with our “minor league” writing system. Thanks for all your hard work! Please leave your dreams by the door on your way out.

Ethan: Well, we’ll always have the memory of hurling Kobe disciples into apoplectic spasms of rage…back to WarriorsWorld it is.

Beckley: This is all bad Karma for letting Sharkula out of the bag…why Discozilla? WHYYYY?!

@SherwoodStrauss/Ethanstra@gmail.com

@BeckleyMason/Beckleym@gmail.com

Note: All “celebrity” voices impersonated.

Related posts:

  1. “Mama There Goes That Meme!” Ep. 2: Beat those Heat!
  2. “Mama There Goes That Meme!” Ep. 5: The Kobe-Jordan Conversation
  3. “Mama There Goes That Meme!” Ep. 6: Durant is MVP Already
  4. “Mama there goes that meme!” Ep. 1: Carmelo Anthony wants to be traded
  5. “Mama There Goes That Meme!” Ep. 3: B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Essay alert! Whilst I can see the merits I do worry that the system your proposing Carlos would create a yo-yo class of teams. Think about it, the first batch of promoted teams would get the best players and the relegated teams would also have the higher level players drafted from previous seasons. Likely these teams would yo-yo between the division each season, freezing out the lowest teams from the top tier because they can never get their hands on the best new talent from the draft. How would these 2nd tier teams that just missed out on promotion every be able to get their hands on the better players? The only answer would be to drop the draft and remove wage caps to let the teams fend for themselves, free market style. And there are major dangers here. As an English man and a fan of EPL (and NBA), lack of a wage cap and implementing relegation can kill the long-term future of teams. I'm a Leeds United fan. We went from the top of the EPL (around year 2000) to a division two tiers lower in just three years. All our team had to be sold (players wages were too high to be sustainable in a lower division where no one wants to pay for TV rights or tickets) and only now, nearly 10 years later, is the team starting to creep back up the league after farming a number of younger players and loaning quality players higher tier clubs from England and abroad. Now, due to the huge gap between the richest EPL clubs and everyone else, there is little chance of ever returning to former glories. We’re frozen out. Meanwhile the richest clubs (Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal) just keep winning and getting richer, creating greater disparity. These proposals might improve the bottom of the NBA to some extent but they would only grow the gap and the Lakers, Celtics and Heat would become EVEN more dominant for the foreseeable future. Part of the reason I love the NBA is because a Cleveland or an Orlando can go from zero to elite in three years off the back of a good draft. Success in the EPL is limited to a very small group. And the only way to get in is having an incredibly rich owner who’s prepared to buy up all the best players (see Man City). For all the rest it’s sports purgatory.

Beckley. Your critique of the idea makes me think of an episode of the Ali G show where he was interviewing a panel of experts on marihuana. They told him that smoking weed impaired your motor skills, caused short term memory loss and dizziness. To which Ali responded: "And what are the nega'ive effects". I think a 26 team NBA would be close to ideal, and the D-league could have, say 18 teams or so. The NBA has an age limit (which I hate but could be a good compromise for the NCAA) so high school phenoms would still play a year of college. The draft would also still happen, except that the teams coming up from the D-league would earn the top picks from each round, they can compliment their squads with free agents for which they will have plenty of money to spend. Occasionally, a team coming up will get a LeBron type player (even a John Wall), and they will stay in the NBA, maybe become an established team. The availability of more teams would hopefully encourage more Mark Cuban type billionaires to invest in teams. Imagine the San Jose Oracles, owned by a bitter Larry Ellison, buying up the talent from Europe to get his revenge on the Warriors. There would still be plenty of players to play in the NCAA (44 teams can only employ so many players) and possibly more kids would be encouraged to play basketball, having more of a chance to be a pro. Also less regular season games, and home grown talent on small teams would be a big boost to the league in my eyes. A man can dream...

Good post guys. Long time reader, first time writer. As long as we're in the imagining crazy ideas territory. What would be your thoughts on making the D-league more of a second division. The 3 (or 4 if you need 2 from each conference) teams in the NBA with the worst record descend to the D-league, while the top teams from the D-league make the jump to the NBA. To make up for the disparity in talent, they get awarded the top 3 (or 4) picks in the draft. The team winning the D-league getting first pick. This would make nearly all regular season games mean something, would make the number one pick in the draft a reward for winning, not sucking, and would make the D-league mean a lot more than a feeder league for the NBA.

Hey Carlos, Thanks for the support and for finally commenting! Your idea is indeed crazy, because it would require the entire basketball community, from youth levels to the NBA, to make major changes. I'm not saying it wouldn't be awesome, but here are some things I think would have to happen: 1- The NBA could only sustain, at most 20 teams in each division, so right off the bat you are going to have to cut 33% of the league. How would you make these cuts? I think you would want to just cut the bottom third by wins, which would hopefully include some awesome fan bases that wouldn't abandon their clubs. I think if you just snip the smallest markets you send the wrong message about why you are making this change. 2- College basketball would be irrelevant and populated by people with no hope of playing pro ball... and nerds. If the NBA went to this 2 division system, every team would need to develop a serious youth system to farm young talent. EPL teams that perennially stink are buoyed by strong attendance because all of the talent is homegrown, and I think the NBA second division teams would need this support as well. If the current NCAA system remained in place, what would be the incentive to give a crap about an expansion second tier team that is drafting anonymously crappy players? You would pull in a lot of current NCAA fans with this EPL (and recently MLS) model, and it would allow teams like the Reno Sandsharks to stay profitable even if the top team isn't any good by developing then selling top talent. 3- Because of this, there's no draft. That would be sort of lame. 4- Quality of play in the NBA would be phenomenal night in and night out. However, the season would need to be shortened considerably because you can't play hard for 82 games, just can't. What do you think? There are already 47 pro basketball teams in North American counting the D-League so you would have to get rid of a couple of those, and move one to Seattle (they would be called the Pilots), one to St. Louis, one to Kansas City, one to San Diego maybe one in Tampa (great high school basketball tradition in Seattle, Tampa and San Diego especially)... I'm kind of getting excited about this...

Funny as. Great work. Charlotte Sharkulas would be awesome in the D-League.

You know I've been thinking that either Chris Paul or Rondo should be on you banner. Carmelo? more like Marshmelo

New melo-fre banner coming soon, replete with bizarre references

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes