Is Chris Paul still The One?

Chris Paul is doing it and doing it well...but is he doing enough?

This season was supposed to be Chris Paul’s triumphant return to point guard supremacy. Injury behind him, we expected Paul to return to MVP form and lead the Hornets on an improbable playoff run.

But things haven’t gone exactly as planned. While Paul is hooping at a high level, other point guards like Deron Williams, Derrick Rose, Rajon Rondo and Russell Westbrook are playing better than ever, cluttering the ever more contentious debate over who the game’s best point really is.

So what are we to make of Chris Paul’s season thus far?

The statistics and anecdotes tell a conflicting story.

By many accounts, it’s been a successful year. Paul is leading the league in PER, assist/TO ratio (4.15 per game), and steals per game while averaging the highest True Shooting % of his six year career. He’s become the league’s fifth best three point shooter at 45%, its sixth best free throw shooter at 89.7%, and is third in the league in assists per game. Breath. Those are incredible numbers.

The total efficiency in his game is second to none, as born out by these conventional and advanced statistics. But somehow it doesn’t seem like enough from the dominant player we saw in 2008-9 season, Paul’s last healthy year.

Perhaps some of this has to do with the six footer’s ongoing recovery from his 2009 knee injury. Paul, who claims to be healthy, seems to lack his typical burst in the open court, though in the half court his strength and explosive lateral quickness still allow him to penetrate nearly at will. That is, in short distances, Paul remains elite, though his full court sprint is no longer as impressive.

And though Paul is producing more efficiently than ever before, he’s also producing less. His point per game average of 16.5 is Paul’s lowest since his rookie season, and his assists per game are under 10 for the first time since 2007.

Is it possible Paul is playing better but doing less?

This season, despite regaining his stature as the NBA’s pick and roll practitioner par excellence, Paul’s Usage rate has plummeted (Usage percentage is an estimate of the percentage of team plays used by a player while he was on the floor). In the season before his injury, CP3 had the second highest Usage rate amongst point guards and sixth highest overall at 27.9 (Tony Parker was at 30.1). This year, Paul’s 22.7 Usage rate is the 22nd highest for his own position. Among point guards with higher Usage rates are usual suspects Westbrook, Rose and Williams (who ranked one, two, three in this metric), but also Rodney Stuckey, John Wall and Brandon Jennings.

The only point guard in Paul’s class with a lower Usage is Rajon Rondo, which isn’t at all surprising considering that Rondo hunts shots like a gazelle hunts lions.

Paul’s peculiar play raises an interesting argument over whether it’s better to play less efficiently but have a greater impact on the game or play as efficiently as possible without ever forcing. At times this year it seems the Hornets may need him to be more aggressive, especially at the end of games.

The real issue is that Paul is disproportionately taking fewer shots at the rim, a hint that despite signs to the contrary, something could still be bothering him physically. Paul is shooting at the rim just 2.1 times per game this season compared with 4.4 times per game in 2009. As a side effect of Paul’s inability or unwillingness to drive consistently (he could still be recovering his confidence after his knee injury), he’s also shooting about two freethrows fewer this year than in his last healthy season.

In the Hornets’ most recent game, Paul could not muster his sublime former ability to take over the contest when his team needed its best player to do just that. In the fourth quarter, Paul checked back into the game after a brief rest with his team winning by one point and 9:15 left to play. Over the next nine minutes and change, the Warriors outscored the Hornets 26-18 and Chris Paul took two only jump shots (missing both), four free throws and had two assists.

The way he finished, no one would say he played a perfect game. Yet he finished with a near flawless stat line of 24 points, 13 assists (two TOs), and six rebounds on 6-12 shooting.

As a result of moments like these, I find myself confused as to whether Paul is really back, even though he  may well be the game’s best point guard. He’s cruising through this season beautifully, but doesn’t appear to have yet found the extra gear that made him so, so special.

@BeckleyMason/Beckleym@gmail.com

Related posts:

  1. Chris Paul wins the 2011 MVP
  2. What Can Chris Bosh’s Exit Tell Us About Carmelo Anthony’s future?
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Late to the party, but D Will doesn't get his team involved early at all in the sense that they constantly are playing from behind and have to rally late. His team is playing better than the Hornets (sometimes) because he has a better team. Boozer/Millsap or David West is the question to me. Only thing Paul lacks is the aforementioned shot taking. He's too unselfish. Though I prefer a Stockton type PG to an AI type. Where is CP3's Malone?

D-Will is the best PG right now. He gets his team involved early and takes over the game when the time is right. He is bigger and stronger than paul with none of the injury concerns, and his team is playing much better than the hornets. If you were the Utah GM would you trade Williams for Paul straight up? I wouldn't...

This is very interesting and I think you did a good job in explaining how PER (which to my understanding, measures efficiency) is sometimes inadequate in measuring how dominant players are because it fails to account for production. My question would be is there a WARP player evaluation for NBA players similar to how baseball players are evaluated? Something to account for increased production at a high level, even with a slight drop in efficiency. Just to focus on CP3's shooting: .616 true shooting percentage per Hollinger 16.5 PPG Now what if he were to take more shots while scoring less efficiently? Something like: .600 TSP 19 PPG I don't completely understand PER but my guess is that it would drop in the second scenario (correct me if I'm wrong). But isn't the second set of stats better? If you multiplied TSPxPPG could you get a better metric for effective scoring?

I feel sorry for Paul, he needs to get away from the Hornets and onto a championship team... come to the Magic Chris :-)

Excellent analysis. While Paul is probably still the best PG in the game today, there is more to the game than efficiency. Sometimes leaders need to take over a game, play aggressively even if it means you may make a mistake. Players like Williams, Rose, and Westbrook may not be as good as Paul, but they put their teams on their backs when they need to. Paul insists on guiding his team by the hand. It may look pretty when it comes to efficiency, but you wonder if there were times where Paul could have shifted into high gear and carried his team. Efficiency tells us a lot -- but production still matters. I don't know. Maybe he is hurt. But I want to see my star player take over a game when his team needs it. Whether it's due to injury or choice, Paul hasn't done that enough this year.

Beginning of the season, when Hornets were hot, no one would have argued CP3 is the man. Now, the team comes back down to earth and we wonder (perhaps legitimately), if he's 100%. I think we can still say he's back to MVP form since he is, without a doubt, the most "valuable" player on his team. Anyway, I think his focus might be a big issue this season. He knows his team isn't that great and is not as motivated. I can't read his mind. But, he wanted to get out this summer and just because he couldn't get his way doesn't mean he forgot what he wanted. I'm sure he's paying attention to Heat and thinking, "man, that's what me + Melo + Stoudemire could be doing" or something like that.

Good article. I just want to say every real fan knows the truth, though - Paul is the top PG in the NBA, and it's not even a debate. Don't make people who want to say otherwise feel like they have a legitimate opinion, they don't.

I have LP...no excuse. Well, except the fact that Blake Griffin plays 82 games this year too...

I'll tell you why you haven't seen the Hornets: they're only on National TV once all year, playing the Cavs in February. Even their home games are blacked out for New Orleans area people. If you don't have league pass, you aren't seeing the best PG around.

Haven't watched enough Hornets games (why, I don't know) to comment on CP3, but: "hunts shots like a gazelle hunts lions" Is that you own analogy? It's phenomenal.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes