Addressing Anger (If you really care about stadium workers)

Wednesday morning, I tumbled out of bed and into Twitter thorns. My “Nobody really cares about stadium workers” post had prompted much immediate (tweeted) outrage–or at least more anger than I’m used to consuming before sun up. So, I would like to use this space as a means for a) addressing that sentiment and b) better conveying some points that stoked such sentiment.

To briefly summarize the post, it is my belief that lockout-impacted stadium workers are often trotted out as symbols, and that the widely echoed sympathy for their plight is mostly feigned. I believe that what animates the “empathy” is a selfish desire on our part as fans and writers to end this lockout, to get basketball back in our lives. If we hold up workers as lockout victims, we can use them as a cudgel against the rich people who keep next season at arm’s length. In the post, I also wondered if hoops writers are venting their own employment frustrations while wearing stadium worker masks.

But, perhaps you as a reader or blogger do feel genuine sadness for these security guards and concession operators. Perhaps you write or comment purely out of solidarity with the less fortunate. If you are that person, then I wrote this sentence for you:

“To those who really do feel deep sympathy for stadium workers, I apologize. It’s not that I think you, personally, are lying–I just don’t believe you in the aggregate.”

To be fair, this sentence was not a marvel of concision or clarity. That certainly could have factored into why I received so much feedback from people who felt personally assaulted by my argument. So, in different words: I believe the overall “poor stadium workers!” trope exists for mostly selfish reasons, but that it is also possible for the selfless to use it. If you feel confident in your motivations, there is little reason to convince me of them. You can literally choose whether or not I’m insulting you…you possible bastard. With that in mind, why would you want to doth protest too much?

Now, for a paragraph that many fixed on (referenced above):

“Though many writers are waxing aggrieved about the thousands of lockout-pinched blue collars, I see no movement to reimburse the impacted. Where is the charity, the fund, hell, the Facebook group? If such a groundswell of actual deep feeling existed, then so too would a response. For all the concern regarding “actual” lockout victims, fingers are only lifted in the wringing of hands.”

I think some interpreted this as, “It is hypocritical to shed light on those suffering unless you’re in the trenches combating the problem.” I personally do not agree with that sentiment and I can understand why a few of you struck out against it. But I’m not making that argument. My point: The dearth of real action to combat a supposedly heart-wrenching problem is illustrative of how little readers and writers actually care. I’m not stating that you need to be working the soup kitchen in order to talk about homelessness–I’m saying that, if no such soup kitchens existed, it would say a lot about the absence of public worry on that issue. And if no such kitchens existed–but I kept reading screeds and comments that blamed homelessness on a select group of villains–I’d wonder after the veracity of all the righteous outrage.

Somewhat tangentially…

I don’t believe that the absence of work for stadium employees is some moral crime. To those impacted, it can be a personal tragedy. But on a macro scale, there is data to suggest that an NBA season causes a net negative economic impact on cities. Can you feel badly for those economically hurt by a lockout? Sure, just know that a lockout may help more people than it hurts.

Also, NBA teams are often once removed from all these stadium workers they’re supposedly responsible for. The Warriors get such services through SMG “Worldwide Entertainment and Convention Venue Management,” a large corporation that is headquartered in West Conshoshocken, Pennsylvania. Can you feel badly for SMG employees who might lack for cash opportunities this NBA season? Sure, just know that their company is free to run more events a short Bart ride away at the San Francisco Convention Center.

When you rip squabbling players/owners for slightly lessening SMG profits, you hurtle down a slope more slippery than K2 + WD40. By this logic, I’m hurting families by not buying up various fried foods whenever I walk into Oracle. Extending this logic, any striking employee or locking employer should be castigated, based solely on the negative Butterfly Effect consequences of a work stoppage. As in, autoworkers should never strike because they might deprive order takers at fast food drive-thru windows.

Perhaps it speaks to how withered the social safety net is that we’re looking towards basketball for economic salvation of the working poor. It’s the NBA, not the WPA, and last I checked: David Stern is no Franklin Roosevelt.

But back to the original piece, the defensive criticism of it, and my defensive criticism in response. To those whom I framed as disingenuous, to those I accused of not actually feeling for stadium workers: It’s okay to not feel their hurt on a meaningful level. It wouldn’t make you a bad person–at least I hope it wouldn’t define you as awful, because I’m certainly among the callous. I don’t necessarily feel deep sadness at the mention of another’s economic pain. The world is replete with suffering, and one would be crazy to empathize with every thinly broadcasted iteration of it.

It isn’t that I lack for any context. Though luckier than so many, I once found myself out of work for a nasty stretch. A particular memory still haunts: It’s past midnight in the vacant Safeway parking lot and I’m staring at my ATM receipt. It’s heavy in the negative, and the ugly numbers can’t even convey how bad the situation really is. There’s no job to show up for the next day, no purpose, no future, and no reason to wake. My head hits my hands, and I sob simply because it breaks up the numbing throb of shame-steeped desperation.

So yes, I get why people might feel terribly for those fired by fate. I just don’t believe such feelings are fueling the flawed message of: CBA talkers should wrap this up quickly on behalf of the wounded.


Related posts:

  1. Nobody really cares about stadium workers
  2. To Fellow Lost Bloggers
  3. On the lockout and the myth of guaranteed profits
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

@Ignarus Appreciate that you took the time to respond, but I was claiming that the "troll!" accusation is similar to the "race card!" accusation, not similar to "playing the race card." Perhaps I should have fleshed that out a bit better. By the way, I don't believe what I said to be "wildly speculative," though I can see how you see it that way. But you seem to be taken aback by my assessment of "other writers’ inner motivations." My response: They really aren't that "inner," and such inferences are common if life. For example, you mentioned "the owners’ collective greed." Did the owners come out and say, "We want more money because we like money nom nom nom nom,"? No, they say that this all about competitive balance, parity, or some other claptrap. So how do you possibly know their "inner motivations." Well, you're (correctly) divining their "inner motivations," due to your basic understanding of human behavior and the context surrounding that behavior. NBA bloggers are motivated by wanting an NBA season, much in the same way NBA owners are motivated by wanting more scrill. Writers keep citing the tragedy of other people losing what is at most, an 18 hour a week job, and using that to heap guilt on those who prolong the lockout. And what's strange is this: There is little to no in-depth reporting on the afflicted, possibly because the stadium workers might lose their symbol status (See: Arnovitz's 'Mad Men' piece), possibly because the writers really don't care about them all that much. Probably a little of both. Writers, bloggers and fans will cheer any damned deal that comes down the pike. Their overriding interest is in seeing basketball. Would you dispute this? You can certainly disagree with my assessment of their inner motivations, but there is nothing wrong making an assessment--in the abstract. Now for this: "If anything, the one attacking the character of others for the purpose of undermining their arguments was YOU." Yes, that was me. I did that. What's the problem?

It's absolutely nothing like playing the race card. The ad hominem is a logical fallacy only when it's *part of the argument* for why your conclusion is false. In this case, the ad hominem ("Damn, that guy is a troll") has nothing to do with why your argument is wrong. Your argument is wildly speculative regarding a topic (other writers' inner motivations) that you have no access to beyond extrapolating from your own introspections and musings. The subsequent conclusion that "Ethan is trolling for attention" arises AFTER one concludes that you wildly accused other writers of insincerity on irresponsibly speculative grounds. Personally, I don't know if you were trolling or not. I'd hope not, but it's also disappointing to think you felt that it was genuinely justified to be so iresponsible in your accusations. If anything, the one attacking the character of others for the purpose of undermining their arguments was YOU. Maybe that gets you page views and links from writers who want to argue about something, but in terms of putting forth a well-reasoned argument, it's quite poor. =============== I didn't think you were trolling. Usually trolls are less imaginative/creative. But it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that other people came to that conclusion. My best explanation for what happened there was that it was a "rumor from Ethan's head" that unaccountably got blown up into a full-on column involving an unreasonable blanket accusation of journalistic hypocrisy. And it's not like I don't usually enjoy reading stuff that gets put up here. Hoopspeak is one of the best-written and most thoughtful NBA blogs I've run into. I'd feel remiss if I *didn't* criticize a surprisingly flimsy argument with an unwarrantedly accusatory conclusion. Eh... =============== All of this overexamination aside, I'm finding it very hard to adequately express the extent to which I'm disgusted with David Stern right now. I can honestly say I'm considerably less excited about the NBA knowing that, at any moment, seemingly, the owners' collective greed will threaten to overrule anything a fan could have been looking forward to. Fans actually care about whatever it is that they're fans of. But now it's not really safe to truly care about NBA basketball anymore... The NBA and I are officially "on a break." I'll check up on it and try to keep in touch with the folks I came to like as a result of our relationship, but don't be surprised if my dejectedness and I go out and impregnate some other, much less compatible sport.

@Ignarus They call me a "troll," because it's a convenient way to dismiss an argument. If you question the motives of the argument maker (He's saying this to piss us off out of some deviant impulse!), you can easily move on from thinking about the topic. In that way, calling someone a "troll" is like accusing someone of "playing the race card."

Your point about potential symbolism was kinda interesting but it was unwarranted to blow it up into an accusation leveled against writers who might just feel something that you don't right now. Imaginative speculation on subconsicous motivations but bullshit overstated argument. ...and that's why they called u [troll], i betcha.

I love this website and the internet. In no way would this debate be possible without it. We'd be stuck with Bill Plaschke's garbage. Thanks Ethan. I don't aways agree with you, but you sure as shit know how to make a man think (and react).

Trackbacks

  1. [...] debate featuring Bomani Jones was fairly insane.If you missed it, here’s Blake Griffin naked.Ethan Sherwood Strauss wonders if anyone REALLY cares about the arena workers: “When you rip squabbling players/owners for slightly lessening SMG profits, you hurtle down [...]

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes