Nobody really cares about stadium workers

This is in response to multiple opinion postings, but per HS policy, none will be specifically cited…
Sympathy for the plighted is a good thing, and there isn’t enough of it in this country. So why am I criticizing the “Let’s focus on locked out stadium workers” trope? What could possibly be wrong with pointing out that, in a battle between wealthy factions, working stiffs are collateral damage?

To those who really do feel deep sympathy for stadium workers, I apologize. It’s not that I think you, personally, are lying–I just don’t believe you in the aggregate. Though many writers are waxing aggrieved about the thousands of lockout-pinched blue collars, I see no movement to reimburse the impacted. Where is the charity, the fund, hell, the Facebook group? If such a groundswell of actual deep feeling existed, then so too would a response. For all the concern regarding “actual” lockout victims, fingers are only lifted in the wringing of hands.

To writers, the stadium employees are symbols. They are salt of the earth, striving, dragging regular-guy concerns and needs. They are what is “good.” They are what is “real.” These proletariat stand-ins stand in contrast to squabbling millionaire bastards who deign break the seal on a season we crave. Because of this, the screwed workers are a convenient cudgel against two sides whom we would wish into any damned CBA, so long as it’s done and done quickly.

Billionaires, millionaires, accept concessions! Not for me, but for those who work concessions!

When lobbying for basketball’s hasty return, “Think of the children!” logic just sounds weightier than, “I like when ball goes through hoop.”

Or perhaps, the stadium worker symbolizes the plight-highlighting writer. Though I tend to hoop blog from a platinum-embossed swivel chair that connects to a peasant-bone ivory desk, there are many scribes who struggle financially. Sadly, there isn’t a whole lot of money in talking about why the ball did or did not go through the hoop. Sadder, there will certainly be less money in the absence of a season. So, when a basketball scribe casts a deep frown in the direction of empty pretzel stands, I often wonder if he’s simply looking in the mirror…and seeing a future poor person.

It is impolitic for that writer to post, “Forget the pretzel guy, I’m so screwed if there’s no NBA!” It doesn’t help that most fans reflexively hate the sportswriting class (I believe public opinion has swung against everyone except Joe Posnanski). By lamenting the struggle of underemployed concessioneers, the writer can cathartically vent while disguised as someone the readers can side with.

So if writers get socially acceptable catharsis, and the oft-ignored workers get some pub, then what’s the problem? Well, I take issue with the idea that players and owners are morally wrong for gridlocking, that they are somehow destructively frivolous for taking hard stances when billions are at stake. I object to a self-serving argument that asks either party to agree for the sake of agreeing–or to accept a bad CBA deal for the sake of part-time stadium employees. Is it awful that some amid the working poor are about to be worse off? Certainly, but the desperation of America’s shrinking middle class is something for a government to address–not Derek Fisher.

I still clench my stomach whenever David Stern makes this owner-stoked money play sound like a plea to help young Oliver Twist, and the NBA could certainly be shamed over how much public cash they use. That’s more my moralizing speed, perhaps you prefer to yell at Joe Johnson’s shoe closet. But let’s not act like sleazy politicians, mawkishly feigning concern for Joe-Selling-Six-Pack.


Related posts:

  1. To Fellow Lost Bloggers
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

It's just that this stuff is so depressing that sometimes that I have to deliberately misread things that make me sad and then post sarcastic solidarity. *** Obvious nonsense aside, I'm not sure how much I agree with the point you're actually making though. I'm sure there's some truth to it, but it's more than legitimate to point out who the owners are hurting with this lockout and subsequently calling their harmful petulance into question. NBA owners get sooooo much money from local governments in special deals and stadium funding that a lockout isn't *really* just between them and their players anymore. Of course, it's unfortunate that the owners don't have any other tools on their belt to bargain for a better deal THAN using a lockout, but with guys like Ratner using the Nets to *literally* kick people out of their homes under the umbrella of emminent domain, you're naive if you sympathize too much. It also doesn't help the owners' cases that more than half the losses they're reporting as costs of running their teams are *actually* costs related to *buying* their teams. If Sarver overpaid for his team, it shouldn't be incumbent on anyone else to make up for those losses. How many bailouts does this guy need? I can certainly understand why you'd be ill at ease trumpeting too loudly about stadium workers when there's a sense that it's more of a proxy for your own threatened work..ing..hood (ugh, that's not a word at all), but it's completely valid to point out any and all collateral damage that might result from the owners' astonishingly out-of-touch sense of entitlement. It's all fun and games 'til somebody gets hurt, right? Well, it was never fun and it's not much of a game when non-millionaires miss paychecks. *** And because I can't find a better place to put it, I'm still chuckling about the "Jimmer as Ogre with Catapult" comparison. I can't look at the guy without unconsciously Shrek-heading him. So thanks for that.

I think this is relatively accurate. I'll admit that I have used the plight of the stadium workers as a reason to end the lockout. I'll also admit that while I feel bad for them, I don't feel bad enough to actually do something about it. That probably makes me a dick, but truthfully I want to watch basketball more than I care about stadium workers...woops.

I think Ethan nailed it. I think many hardcore fans and writers are way too wrapped up in the lockout to objectively say "well I really just care about the basketball". Taking up the plight of stadium workers or lower level nba employees gives you just cause to vent your outrage at a situation that you have no control over. I'm sure there are those who care legitimately. But I have always seen basketball as a form of entertainment, not as something I need to make it through life. When it comes to the choice between worrying about the NBA and worrying if my wife and I are going to be able to make the next student loan payment, I go with the latter. The fact that so many bloggers bitched at Ethan this morning about this says more to me than this entire post.

This post is about how and why writers use stadium workers as a symbol, not about how they have it so great.

good point ethan. those damn stadium workers think they're bigger than the game. someone needs to tell them that we don't tune in to watch people sell overpriced hot dogs to fat people. ...and SCREW people who own resaurants across from arenas!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] that thousands of workers are going to lose jobs because of the lockout (by the way, don't tell me I don't care). They just want extra cash so that they can continue to ride in leer jets and eat $500 [...]

  2. [...] WNBA Finals last night]: :07 – :11 – The Stadium Workers [A discussion brought on by Ethan's most recent piece.] :11 – :26 – Person of Interest: Emma Carmichael [Part 1, Part 2 - Emma talks about [...]

  3. [...] morning, I tumbled out of bed and into Twitter thorns. My “Nobody really cares about stadium workers” post had prompted much immediate (tweeted) outrage–or at least more anger than I’m used to [...]

  4. [...] sentiment still remains. Maybe the owners and players don’t “owe” us anything, and maybe, as Ethan Sherwood Strauss argues over at Hoopspeak, us bloggers are pretending to care about stadium workers to hide our owns selfish intentions (my [...]

  5. [...] waitresses, custodians and all the others who make part-time money as a result of NBA games. But as Ethan Sherwood Strauss pointed out, “nobody really cares about stadium workers.” Strauss was mostly talking about writers [...]

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes