A new arena in Seattle…could it be?

Somehow I’ve stationed myself in the “North Face Only” section of a bus headed from New York to Washington, DC. Outside it’s about 39 degrees, the low Frebruary sky is an unflinching grey. Ahh, reminds me of sweet home Seattle.

Seattle, where the Seattle Times has reported that business casual Bay Area investor Chris Hansen has a big, fat proposal on the table to build a shiny new arena right next to SafeCo Field and whatever they call where the Seahawks play these days.

Allow me to join the bi-coastal chorus of “WAHOOOO!!!”

Hansen grew up in the working class Ranier Valley neighborhood before becoming an uber-investor in Silicon Valley (his company, Valiant Capital, has an almost $800 billion portfolio). He’s a lifelong Sonics fan who called seeing them win their ’79 title a defining moment of his life. OF HIS LIFE!

The details aren’t all out yet on the plan, but here’s what we know:

  • The arena is estimated to cost about $400 million. The land on which Hansen has proposed it be built is zoned for stadiums and would create a real stadium district in Seattle where teams could share parking and other facilities.
  • Hansen is obscenely wealthy, can figure out how to get a large portion of the stadium build done privately and is willing to build in a tax on stadium proceeds to fit a 2006 measure by the Seattle voters that demands all publically funded stadiums turn a profit for the city.
  • Seattle is a top 15 TV market and has a huge population of tech-savvy people with disposable income. In the days where profitability comes from leveraging the value of live TV with a local sports station and packaging content online, the league would be adding a team that would likely be a revenue sharing payer (this is good for other owners thinking about voting a team to Seattle.)
  • David Stern has said the NBA will not want expand, so any team that would play in Seattle is playing somewhere else right now.
  • Stern greased the wheels for the Sonics to move. A decision that makes no business sense for the league (as great as the fans in OKC are, there just aren’t many of them) and sent the message that if your city won’t pony up the dough, I’ll move the whole stinkin’ franchise (and that it’s smart to send him sycophantic emails).
  • Now he’s doing the same thing with the Kings, who have a March 1 deadline to figure out their own stadium issues.
  • 98% of North Carolina residents think their professional team is still called the Tar Heels.
  • Seattle sustained the Sonics for 40 years before moving and the city is STILL growing. That means it’s a better market for basketball now than at any time in it’s illustrious, championship havin’ history.
  • I’m not proud to say I would take another city’s team, but I would, no questions asked.
  • The Thunder franchise retained all rights to Sonics history (though not all the intellectual property rights). Gary Payton will one day be surpassed by Durant as the Thunder’s all-time leading scorer (excuse me while I puke up the rest of my childhood memories).
  • Any new team might need a new name. I vote the Seattle Pilots. It links to the Sonics’ Boeing-based name and was the name of a failed Seattle baseball team.***

I recently sent a full video of the Sonics’ victory over the Jazz in Game 7 the 1996 Western Conference Finals to a friend of mine (worth watching just to see the rally outside the stadium). He said it was “the first NBA game I’ve watched start to finish in years.” This game happened more than 15 years ago. There is a tremendous appetite for a team in Seattle, and I hope against hope that Hansen’s proposal isn’t just the most lifelike mirage that’s held the attention of deserted Seattle hoops fans.

***Note: ACH! It turns out the Pilots are taken… that team became the Milwaukee Brewers, of all things. Back to the drawing board. What about the Steelheads?? Like the Salmon!…ok, maybe more thinking necessary.

Related posts:

  1. An Open Letter to Sacramento Kings Fans
  2. The last time George Karl had a killer defense…
  3. Remembering the Malone free throw chant
  4. Email exchange: Tom Ziller on the Kings, relocation, and secular churches
  5. The Vocal Stylings of Kevin Calabro, 1996
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Great article Beck. It might also be worth mentioning that this arena deal is dependent upon Seattle acquiring an NHL team as well...probably the Coyotes. Seattle had a great hockey team called the "Metropolitans" (the Mets) that won the first stanley cup trophy before moving. Would love to see that name return to the NHL team.

@PatrickD speak for yourself and not for Seattle. There are thousands of basketball fans out here in Seattle that are dying for a basketball team and no matter what team we get, we will support them. Even if we don't have the old sonics team back it's not like we can anything about it. And I doubt that people here in Seattle are 'done' with the NBA. I know tons of people who would love to have a basketball team here and would love to see it happen.

A huge portion of Seattleites don't want anything to do with the NBA. The league needs our market more than we need the league. I love basketball, but unless David Stern apologizes, Clay Bennett is removed as the Relocation Committee Head, and we get the Sonics back instead of some JV team like the Kings, then the NBA and its broken business model can choke to death in a house that's on fire and filled with killer bees. I know this goes against the league talking point the media is pushing that everyone in Seattle is super stoked on getting a team back, but it's true. A lot of people here are done with the NBA and have no interest in this happening.

As a longtime NBA fan, I'd love to see the league back in Seattle. But as a lifelong North Carolinian, I say you'll have to pry our Bobcats out of our cold, dead hands. Right, fellow North Carolinians? RIGHT, GUYS? (crickets) Guys? Damn.

It would be great to have basketball in Seattle even though taking other city's team would be awful. I recently read somewhere that all the banners, trophies(including the 1979 title) belong to city of Seattle. And also 1979 rests in Seattle museum. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/jerrybrewer/2013265040_brewer27.html

after reading your article i was even more pumped up about the idea of a new NBA team i am an alll around sports fan though the NBA is at the bottom of my list of favorite leagues having a NBA franchise back in the city of rain would be great. name ideas i have are: "Down poor" "Sun Shower" thats an alternative name for rain and would sound cool "FTT" lets just say thats a shout out to oklahoma city lol "Swag". sure it sounds imature but it really has a ring to it... Seattle Swag

The team would still be called the Sonics, the banners and trophies are still in Seattle. I am really excited about this new arena chance

I'm watching the first few minutes of the Sonics-Jazz game 7 you posted and I had to stop to comment. It is pretty striking how differently (and how well) the game was called 15 years ago. It's also amazing how very little the players complain about calls they would explode over today, even just in the first 5 minutes. Perhaps it's just the particular players involved (Stockton, Malone, Payton). I'd love to go back to this type of basketball with the athletes we have today. Also, I'm 25 years old, not THAT much of an old-timer. :)

Trackbacks

  1. [...] A die-hard Seattle fan admits he’d take another city’s team, even if doing so means putting that city’s fans through the same turmoil Seattle fans [...]

  2. [...] – :05 – Intro + Take The Bacon [B's happy about this, Z & E again refuse to actually [...]

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes