How we enjoy LeBron James

“I think you should sit back and enjoy [LeBron] because I think he’s one of the greatest to ever play our game. As far as playing basketball, you’ve got to enjoy this guy. If you’re a basketball fan, you got to sit back and go, ‘wow, how’d he do that?’ But LeBron James is by far our best player in this league.” – Larry Bird

This was Larry Bird, one of the greatest players to ever lace up a pair of basketball shoes, on the BS Report with Bill Simmons this week. All everybody wants to talk about is how Bird said he’d rather play with Kobe Bryant instead of LeBron if he wanted to win, and there is plenty to glean from that opinion. Bird said that LeBron would be more fun but Kobe’s desire to win was greater. And there is nothing wrong with believing it or disagreeing with that.

What struck me the most about Bird’s comments on LeBron is his plea for fans to enjoy him. Okay, maybe it wasn’t a plea but it seemed like he was urging people to realize how rare of a specimen and player LeBron James is and that when he’s gone, we may be filled with regret that we didn’t take more from his career than a chance to criticize him during the 24-hour news cycle.

To a large degree, I absolutely agree with what Bird is saying. I often get pegged as a LeBron-lover because The Decision didn’t get me all riled up and I say he’s one of my favorite players to watch. I try to dispute the exemplum about LeBron being “unclutch” or “not wanting to win enough” because I find it to be a psychosomatic necessity inside all of us, who never had the desire or drive ourselves to become one of these players. I counter this lazy armchair psychologist role that fans play by using my own take from Psych 101 classes and try to analyze the analysts who want to delve into LeBron’s mind, despite having no real clue how he thinks.

It doesn’t help the problem by any means. It’s just more of a defense mechanism on my part for wanting to discuss the game of basketball more than the soap opera we all try to make it out to be.

A couple months ago, Ethan Sherwood Strauss wrote this about LeBron and his label as a “choker”:

We mock a choker under the presumption that failure unmasks the unworthy, like a test that reveals just how little you studied. Though choking is understood to stem from fear, people have a hard time accepting that fear of failure comes with wanting success.

This has resonated with me more than most things I’ve read about basketball and the assumed psychology that circles it. What if LeBron wants it too much? What if we’ve all been wrong about him and he cares about winning more than he does about everything else? What if THAT is what causes him to fail at the least opportune times?

LeBron’s short diatribe about people wanting to blame him for things that go wrong was humorous and yet accurate to some degree. Obviously, he was being facetious (or I hope he was) when he took the hit for unentertaining cartoons and poor dairy choices, but almost any fault or folly of the Miami Heat over the past 15 months has been pinned on him. Maybe it’s fair to do this and maybe it isn’t. LeBron is the best player in the NBA, even if you hate him. So when things go wrong for his team, it’s only natural and fair to put the onus on him, first and foremost.

And honestly, I think that’s how the collective choose to enjoy LeBron James’ time in this league. Larry Bird’s recommendation for enjoying what LeBron does on the basketball court seems to be asking for more tolerance, but I don’t think that’s how people choose to enjoy him.

We enjoy his highlights. Few players dunk in games the way he does, make the passes he makes, or find ways to make the impossible become YouTubeable the way that LeBron does and we love this about him. Despite all of your hatred or dislike for him, he can make your heart jump for even a split-second at times. We enjoy his successes because on some level, I think a lot of people want him to justify the hype with winning titles.

Most of all, people seem to enjoy him through reveling in his shortcomings. I don’t know if that’s fair or not, but it’s a reality. If the Miami Heat are about to lose, the Daily Dime Live’s traffic usually doubles. If LeBron is having a bad game, a lot of people would like you to do the math and total up the number of rings he has won in comparison to others throughout the history of the league.

Whether you want to label it as jealousy, self-righteousness, or just flat-out not liking LeBron because you don’t like him, I don’t know that NBA fans have ever enjoyed the story of a player’s career quite like we enjoy LeBron James.

You just have to figure out what that enjoyment means to you.

Related posts:

  1. Phillip Roth and the LeBron James “Scandal”
  2. His Own Man: LeBron James Finally Escapes Michael Jordan’s Shadow
  3. LeBron James and The Absence of Basketball Bushido
  4. How to compare LeBron James and Kevin Durant
  5. LeBron James: the NBA’s most subversive player
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

How was LeBron's quote after the Heat lost the Finals not taking responsibility? He wasn't addressing his responsibility either way; he was merely making a perfectly reasonable point about perspective--one that if he weren't LeBron James, most people would probably have agreed with. LeBron's failings are just more glaring because, for whatever reason, he does so passively. We don't seem to have the same problem with Kobe doing everything he can to shoot the Lakers out of Game 7 of the NBA Finals; Kobe was failing actively, but he was still failing.

Great piece here. My two cents: Can we be of the opinion that James isn't clutch without thinking that he doesn't "want it"? Personally, from the outside comparing him to other elite players it appears that Kobe for example, is phenomenally driven (although I'm not a Kobe fan, I respect him and his rings definitely give me a bias) and more driven than LeBron, but I don't get the impression that he doesn't care, in fact I'd probably agree with you and say he wants it too much. I agree with a previous commenter in that I think the world of Lebron as a player (but not as much as a person) and I admit I primarily enjoyed watching Dirk win his first title, but I also enjoyed seeing the Heat lose. That story-line, fair or not was great for the NBA. I definitely think there are some people who connect what they see as negative personality traits with bad end of game performances and villanize him that way. And I do hold the opinion that he is not a clutch player, but I can hold that opinion and attribute it to him not handling high leverage situations well. He would know best why that is, my best guess would be him psyching himself out because of him "wanting it", so I agree with you on that, I just don't make the same automatic connection between "clutch" and desire as you do.

What is "the collective" you speak of? Who cares? Write about basketball, not about what you think some people might be thinking about basketball maybe.

I don't understand how Strauss' observation adds anything to our understanding of what choking is. It's a given that people choke because they want to succeed. People don't choke when they have no fear of failure. As in... yes, LeBron wants to win, but what he hasn't done is found a way to balance his desire to win with his fear of performing badly in a way that allows him to apply maximum engagement and effort in a pressured game. The fact that his desire to win is so strong that it corners him into passivity is exactly what choking is. Note that I'm not talking about failing. I'm not a Miami Heat fan, but if I were, I'd want to lose a series with LeBron taking the ball to the hole as often as possible, with high usage rates, influencing as many offensive plays as possible.

I have the utmost respect for LeBron's athletic abilities. He is very obviously a fantastic basketball player, and physically he is on a level with only a couple of other guys in the league. However, I have no respect for LeBron as a person, at least based on everything I've ever read about him combined with all of the ridiculous quotes he's spouted off over the years. Similarly, I have absolutely no problem with him choosing to leave Cleveland, but doing it in such a narcissistic and mean-spirited manner was unacceptable. LeBron had to know what he meant to his hometown and what his leaving would mean, and yet he still created yet another painful name for a sports catastrophe for a city that contains a history filled with painfully named sports catastrophes. And if he didn't know, well, that's almost worse, isn't it? Maybe we'll never see another athlete as physically gifted as LeBron James, but if it also means that we'll never see another athlete as self-centered, completely self-unaware, and completely unwilling to accept any responsibility for his failings (see: his quote about all the people who had to go back to their miserable lives after celebrating a Heat loss in the Finals) and missteps (the way he left the Cavaliers a smoldering wreck on national television while former teammate Ilgauskas politely thanked the city after opting to leave in a very nice letter in the Plain Dealer), maybe that's a fair trade.

LeBron is the best player in the world (probably by the margin described by Bird) and is unbelievably-fun to watch, either live or on tv. He's disliked by so many, in large part, because The Decision was so self-unaware and mean to Cleveland fans, and also because it ruined the basketball chemistry that would otherwise exist on the teams of Dwyane Wade and LeBron James. Those two should be the undisputed leader of their respective title contenders rather than duplicating one another in ways that call into question whether each as an individual is even helpful or necessary for the team to become a champion. LeBron isn't "unclutch," but he disappeared in bizarre fashion during two of the most important playoff series' of his career. Boston-Cleveland in 2010 should have been a romp, and it was looking that way after Game 3, and then LBJ disappeared and seemed to stop playing the way he normally does. Boston took over and won Games 4-5-6 en route to the Finals. Dallas-Boston in 2011 had a similar flavor, and similarly-puzzling disappearing act by LeBron. If it were to come out in 1 or 5 or 10 or 30 years that LeBron threw those playoff series', it wouldn't really surprise me. He wasn't playing the same as he normally does. Fascinating player to watch for a lot of reasons. He's deserving of much of the praise and criticism he receives. Bird didn't say anything, good or bad, about LeBron, that I didn't agree with.

A well-written article, nice job. American celebrity culture demands that we build our idols up and tear them down simultaneously, making both heroes and villains out of them. Casual fans of the sport want to see Lebron win the championship and they want to see him choke just as badly. The worst thing that could happen is that Lebron plays a great game and loses through no perceived fault of his own and says nothing to the media afterwards. We eat up drama. Give us more drama. Nom nom nom.

I do enjoy his play. I do not enjoy him off the court and avoid anything written about him or anything he says so it won't color my view of his play in a negative light. He is magical with a basketball.

Trackbacks

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes