Daryl Morey and Houston’s Big Freed Three

I can’t remember another NBA moment where a team added three players whose contracts were so openly questioned. Jeremy Lin? A flash in the pan that reflected brighter under those New York lights. Omer Asik? You’re entrusting $25 million to a guy who can’t catch a basketball? Are you an idiot or just stupid? And James Harden, man, I don’t know about him. He just doesn’t strike ya as ya know, a number one guy. An Alpha Dog. The MAN. If he’s your No. 1, you’re never winning anything. You’re seriously going to max out a reserve?

In paying all three, Daryl Morey trusted something quite simple; He trusted what they did. Because, James Harden, Jeremy Lin, and Omer Asik were tangibly good when they played. These guys were doing decent work out in public. It was just a matter of someone trusting that public track record. We’re only three games in, but it would appear, at the very least, that Daryl Morey wasn’t a complete fool for going this route.

It would be ironic if stats-conscious Morey found value in ignoring small sample size concerns. Jeremy Lin’s critics fairly cite his too-brief track record, though some of them will ironically harp on Lin’s one Miami game as more meaningful than the body of work. It is difficult to know just how good Jeremy Lin will be, but we would do well to remember that his late winter success was the result of basketball skill, and not some fairy godmother’s wand wave. Just because “Linsanity!” felt magical, doesn’t mean it was magic. This was just a productive collegian, running a mean pick and roll at the next level.

Players like Lin are always battling against another statistical term–confirmation bias. If  a guy goes undrafted, we keep looking for signs that validate the initial assessment. In the other direction, look at how underperforming high draft picks keep finding buyers. Jeff Green has been consistently disappointing in his career so far. The Boston Celtics saw fit to give the 26 year-old a $36 million dollar contract, and he was subsequently hyped by fans and media in the run up to this season. Ask yourself: Does the undrafted version of Jeff Green get this contract or these expectations? Does DeMar DeRozan eventually get $42 million if he fights his way to the NBA through the D-League?

Jeremy Lin also battled a different kind of perception problem. While Lin’s ethnicity brought about a whole lot of positive attention upon his success, it also caused others to jump to some negative conclusions. As I see it, Jeremy’s flaws are, “shaky high dribble, balky jumper.” And yet, I keep hearing and reading about his lack of athleticism. Interesting assumption, that.

In any organization, in any endeavor, people can get locked into a placement. For Lin, that placement was, “Not drafted.” For James Harden, that placement was, “Sixth man.” Ask yourself this: Why was James Harden, and not Russell Westbrook, the sixth man? Westbrook is far more the prototypical bench scorer than Harden. Was there any special reason why the more productive player came off the bench, apart from incumbency?

Make no mistake: James Harden was the more productive player in relatively fewer possessions. This is a different conversation from “better” or “projects to be better eventually.” We’re talking raw efficiency. In his time with the ball, Harden maximized his contribution with three pointers and free throws. Westbrook produced free throws, but he also dominated the rock en route to many turnovers and missed shots.

But James Harden wasn’t specifically battling Russell Westbrook for playing time. He was backing up Thabo Sefolosha, somewhat ludicrously. I wonder what it would have taken for James to ever supplant Thabo in that lineup, considering that Harden, unlike Manu Ginobili, was young and healthy enough to play full games. Granted, Harden got more minutes than Sefolosha, but 31 MPG wasn’t exactly worthy of the production James garnered. The Beard tallied an absurd 66% true shooting mark and a Durant-equivalent .230 win shares per 48 minutes. By all indications, the Thunder planned on keeping up this arrangement in perpetuity.

Then, after Harden was traded to Oklahoma City, various pundits remarked on why he didn’t strike them as “a franchise guy.” They could still be right, but I would like such statements to be backed by tangible assessments, something better than, “he just doesn’t seem like the type.” Explain why James Harden can’t be who he was with Thunder–but with more minutes and more touches. Related, there seems to be this fallacy that an efficiency drop off for promoted players equals an efficiency cliff (credit Aaron McGuire for this observation). Just because a guy might get worse with more responsibility doesn’t mean he’ll get awful. If James Harden plays 39 minutes per night and gives you a .200 win share mark instead of a .230, you still spent that max contract money wisely.

Finally, Omer Asik dealt with the NBA’s strangest perceptual issue: He suffered from anti-defense bias. I swear, it sometimes seems like this league is in a price fixing conspiracy against its defenders. There are these odes to “defense winning championships,” but then Taj Gibson gets a lesser contract than the aforementioned DeMar DeRozan. David Lee gets over $15 million in 2016 and Ronnie Brewer struggles to stay on any one team. Unless you’re a big man with soft hands, good luck getting paid for defensive brilliance.

Asik was a big man, but his hands were made from WD-40-soaked apple jugs. Asik struggles to catch the softest of passes and gets thwarted at the basket more than Yogi Bear. The cherry on top is that .480 on free throws.

He also happens to play the kind of defense that can cripple an entire offense. Mobile, long, and smart, Omer protects the rim while hounding ball-handlers on pick and roll. Since frontcourt D matters disproportionately, this is no small value. When people scoffed at his $25 million contract, I wondered, “Why isn’t defense worth that much money?”

Asik also contributes offensively, but in subtler ways. He’s a nasty (illegal) screener who can set anyone up from anywhere. This doesn’t get talked about often, but mobility helps a screener. For all the touting of Kendrick Perkins’ screen ability, he’s too slow to get certain places. Omer creates space for Harden in a flash. After setting the pick, Asik juts his butt backwards, like Chris Paul, warding off a defender. This walls off Harden’s man as James sprints towards the hoop. Omer Asik can’t catch a ball, but he can play some offense.

To watch Houston flourish would feel like a revolution. Houston’s Big Three is also the NBA’s Freed Three, because basketball orthodoxy imposed glass ceilings on Harden, Lin, and Asik. Then, Daryl Morey broke the glass apart.


Related posts:

  1. Daryl Morey’s blameless failure
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
schillfactor 5 pts

As a Bulls fan I'm pretty tired of educated basketball writers arguing that Asik's contract was worth it.  We know it was worth what Morey paid, but because of the way it was structure there is no way in anyone's right mind that the Bulls could have been justified in matching it.  So I repeat, you are not smart or novel for pointing out that Asik's contract was worth it.  The issue is simply how did the CBA allow for a loophole that punishes teams that draft well.

holeydonut 106 pts

 schillfactor  I didn't see any other GM's offering Asik anything that would render him a former Bull and a productive member with one of 28 other NBA teams.

 

The point of the article is valid, most other GM's (super-smart-Presti and the-real-GM-Mark-Cuban) felt fit to watch quality skip them. 

 

Toronto gave how much for Landry Fields and Amir Johnson?  The Pacers paid for Gerald Green?  Cuban signed old/injured hacks (Kaman? Really?).  They could have found a way to get quality guys paid rather than find ways to fund mediocrity.

Kate_C 5 pts

Great article - really enjoyed this.

JJ_5589 5 pts

Good article, but I really don't understand why I continue to see people using Lin's collegiate record as evidence that he is actually good. He played in the Ivy League. As a person who went to an Ivy League school, the level of competition is so low. It's like using a good high record as evidence of NBA success.

mathjohnson 5 pts

Great article Ethan.

 

I think your point about the salary bias based on draft status is a good one. We know that this is a huge problem in the NFL, but you'd like to think that the NBA wouldn't have it so much once a player had actually beaten the odds and gotten an opportunity.

 

Of course with Lin it's particularly ugly. I don't think the primary issue is race. I think the primary issue has to do with people already being too invested in Melo, and Melo being unwilling to adapt his game for Lin (unwilling not unable, Melo was fantastic playing off-ball in the Olympics). As with Obama in politics, the race baiting comes out more as a cheap way to score points among a certain crowd than as something that people actually care about.

 

The reluctance to pay Asik of others is so strange as well, but it goes in line with this narrative that we don't have any good big men any more, when in reality the greater trend is that coaches are just getting smarter about offensive strategy. Were Nate Thurmond a young player coming out today, instead of killing team possessions scoring 20 PPG inefficiently, he'd be scoring single digits many nights. He'd be a much more valuable player...and people would be less impressed with him because he wasn't scoring. I can hear it now, "That Nate Thurmond, he's just a role player!"

 

What I keep dwelling on is the incumbency issue combined with the fact that Westbrook got to OKC only one year before Harden. 

 

It was noted before Durant's breakout season (Harden's rookie year) that in the prior year, Durant's +/- data showed him to be hideously bad. Most people saw that as something damning of those types of statistics, but the reality is that young stars who get put in the star role based on expectation of future development are typically hideous on this front...until they aren't. That next season, Durant turned the corner and emerged as a true superstar and the Thunder looked very wise for putting their franchise player of the future on that kind of track, much like the Cavaliers did with LeBron.

 

Even when such an approach fails, you can argue it's for the best. If a guy just can't hack it, maybe it's better we figure it out quickly?

 

However, at the same time Durant was being put in the star role before truly earning it, Westbrook was being put in the secondary star role without having earned it. He shot the second most of anyone on the team (inefficiently), and was the primary playmaker on the team. This was a particularly dramatic turn of events given that Westbrook had only become a starter at UCLA the year before, and he had come to universal acclaim based on his jack-of-all-trades approach, which is not what OKC asked him to do.

 

Westbrook showed promise in the role and the team just kept doubling down as Westbrook kept improving, despite the fact that we've really never seen any signs that Westbrook has great talent as the kind of pass-first distributor you'd expect to be playing with Durant. Of course, you don't get to have perfect talent with perfect fit on your roster so in a normal situations, you'd have to be pretty happy with how things were turning out...

 

Except the team got Harden as well. Harden now appears to be at least in the same league as Westbrook as a player. And Harden would seem a far more natural fit with Durant than Westbrook. And the Thunder it would sure seem never intended to even experiment to see if the team really did have approach right at their finger tips.

 

Why? Because they never really did a true tryout involving Harden for that #2 role early on, and later, when it became apparent that it would have been a good thing to try, the team was too committed to the idea of Westbrook as a second superstar.

 

Just a fascinating turn of events for a team that literally had the best possible luck you could imagine in the draft.

 

Cheers, and some more thoughts on the subject linked below.

 

http://asubstituteforwar.com/2012/11/02/the-presti-dilemma-or-the-perils-of-premature-zealotry/

EthanSherwoodStrauss 10 pts

 mathjohnson Thanks for thoughtful comment, Matt. And yes, I'm fascinated by this uneasy turn of events for this seemingly blessed team. 

holeydonut 106 pts

 mathjohnson  I think the reason Westbrook works well with Durant is because Russel can create his own shot.  It's not so much whether they work well together, it's whether or not there's someone out there that can distract defenses so KD can coast around as necessary and get his when the time comes. \

 

For the most part, that is excluding the media-fueled-controversy last year, Russ knows when/how to get KD going.  The Russ-to-KD as an assist-to-score combo was tops in the league.  They also are fast friends and make a good emotional pairing as well as a gifted athletic pairing.

 

This doesn't work so well against other similar teams with the same/better duo-talent level (most notably the Heat), but does afford the Thunder the luxury of just blasting almost everyone else.

 

There are many other point guards that on paper would work better with Durant, but I contend that the intangibles are worth more than readily apparent.

 

While I agree Presti has been lucky, he's also built his team with focus on the intangibles and personality.  He would never take on a basket case (Cousins) or a person who had a perceived lack of work ethic and team-first attitude (Jimmer).  Drafting quality talent came as a by product of drafting the right mindset.  Bad teams stay bad for a reason.

 

Presti also manufactured much of his "luck" with smart money management.  Keeping the sold glue guys like Collison around shows the discipline and presence of mind that many other GM's lack.

mathjohnson 5 pts

 holeydonut  

Hmm, I'll say up front that first and foremost it's always been clear that Westbrook & Durant do good things together. So it's not like they were terrible.

 

Second, I have to mention that my response was from before this season really started and that in this season we've seen some really impressive progress in the players making up the Harden-less team.

 

Still though, I think you're focusing on whether or not something is good where I'm focusing on whether the talent-to-performance ratio is strong. Or perhaps more accurately, that you seem to assume that because it's good, that must mean the fit is good.

 

You are implying that Durant needs Westbrook, but as I mentioned before, Durant's transformation from a guy who appeared to be actually hurting his team to an MVP-level superstar happened in just one season ('09-10). Team-wise, the result was one of the strongest offensive turnarounds in NBA history. Something you typically see when a superstar joins a team, not simply based on a player coming of age. Durant's year-to-year improvements was one of the most tremendous ever.

 

Westbrook in that year compared to the year prior? Same mid-teens volume, same embarrassing TS%. Westbrook's playmaking was not making it happen for Durant back then, and while I'm sure it's helped Durant some in more recent years, this is only the icing on the cake, not the cake itself. Truly great playmakers bake the cake too.

 

Regarding the assist-to-score ratio last year, this seems an odd thing to bring up for Westbrook. Last year, assists when WAY up for the Thunder whenever Westbrook went to the bench. I'm not saying Westbrook wasn't helping the team, but he wasn't doing it by raising the level of playmaking clearly beyond what they could get from the rest of the team. Granting the rest of the team happened to include Harden so that isn't exactly a typical baseline to be comparing him too, but when you imply that Westbrook makes it easier for Durant to just wait for an easy shot we should expect better.

 

For example, last year the Thunder assisted on FGs at a 9% lower rate with Westbrook compared to without him.

 

The Suns last year assisted FGs at a 12% higher rate with Nash on the floor, and this needs to be factored in on top of the fact their eFG% went up by 7% with Nash on the floor. It's an astronomical difference, and that's what a truly exceptional playmaker will give you. Durant with a player like that would be leading GOAT level offenses, which at this point, he's never really come close to with Westbrook.

 

As far as their positive teammate relationship. I certainly agree that it's good, and that if you start treating the players like emotionless cogs that will seriously endanger the as-nice-as-Spurs morale the team has right now. I don't pretend Presti had any truly cost-free alternatives as of the time he decided he had to let Harden go.

 

But circling back to Harden, I have to note that 2 months into the new season, Harden is now besting Westbrook statistically in almost every possible way. He's scoring more than Westbrook ever has, and doing it with way, way, WAY better efficiency despite the fact that Durant's on the court creating space that makes it way easier for Westbrook. He'd already had the better reputation as a playmaker. He's beating Westbrook by PER & WS, and it would appear by +/- analysis as well.

 

The notion right now that, egos & risk aside, choosing Westbrook over Harden was justifiable seem to me to have disappeared. The hasty anointment of Westbrook as the 2nd star is indeed something that has now cost OKC the player who is both the most talented and best fitting offensive teammate Durant will likely ever get a chance to play with. The astonishing thing is that Durant is becoming so good that that still might not stop the team from reaching dynasty levels.

 

I would indeed call that lucky for Presti.

 

However I'm not trying to say Presti's done nothing well. GM'ing in the NBA can be done very, very poorly. I'm nitpicking on Presti not doing a perfect job, but Presti's occupation is one often occupied by flashy players without any real experience and they often do a horrible job. If I'm an owner, I feel very good in Presti's hands, and would prefer him over most of the GMs in the league.

pinkpeony28 5 pts

loved the article.  it was very insightful.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] believes in seeing past the labels and giving guys a shot beyond whatever preconceived conventional wisdom had them restricted to. [...]

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes