Andre Drummond was the talk of the league. Dunking, blocking and physically dominating on the fast track to superstardom, the 19 year-old giant’s adjustment to the NBA game was close to seamless. He played to his prodigious natural gifts but showed calm, poise and feel far beyond his years, too. It wouldn’t be long before Drummond became such a hit, many forgot what a risk he was once perceived to be.
Drummond’s playing time seemed to lag behind his success.
Detroit head coach Lawrence Frank limited Drummond to just 20 minutes per game despite the rookie’s sizeable individual production and overall impact, holding close the a convention of “bringing him along slowly” as Drummond’s play begged for more exposure. Few players in league history combined Drummond’s athletic pedigree with such precocious immediate results; feed him minutes and reap the benefits, groupthink urged.
But Frank and the Pistons had a less popular and more controversial plan in mind to best foster Drummond’s evolution. And no matter the increasingly antagonistic public perception, they were sticking to it.
In a panel discussion at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, former Miami Heat and Orlando Magic head coach Stan Van Gundy supported nuanced deliberation with respect to player progression.
“The Washington Wizards went through a time where they took JaVale McGee and Andray Blatche and all those guys and they just let them play… The idea is that the players will continue to get better; I don’t buy that. ‘If I can play the way I’m playing and I don’t have to change anything to get my playing time, why am I gonna change it?’ The only way to get better is to say, ‘These are our standards, this is the way we play






