On TrueHoop, Kevin Arnovitz profiles the strain of defining and embracing a system of play in Los Angeles. Here’s what he said about the Clippers:
Back in November, when Los Angeles was engulfed in System Overload the week Brown was dismissed and D’Antoni hired, Los Angeles Clippers coach Vinny Del Negro was asked which system he deployed.
“Chris Paul,” Del Negro said.
Del Negro wasn’t being flip or coy. The question was straightforward, and he offered the best approximation of his team’s blueprint when it had the ball — the Chris Paul System.
“All those names and all that stuff,” Del Negro said of the Princeton, the spread, seven seconds or less, etc. “You just put the ball in the best player’s hands.”
To Del Negro and Paul, the NBA is a superstar league, and the offense they run is dictated by Paul. In the Clippers’ world, his instincts take precedent over any dogma. That intuition is rooted in strong principles. Paul will probe, but he’s meticulous and patient, and in the half court he’ll rarely act until the defense is leveraged.
“On offense, you just try to make the right play,” Paul said. “Every time I come down the court, I want to make sure that two people have to guard me, no matter what. If I’m in a ball screen, I want to make two people have guard me and then somebody is going to be open.”
The Chris Paul system has its advantages — mainly that Chris Paul gets to do what he wants. But when he was hurt, we saw the difference between a system that is player driven, and a system, like the Spurs, that is driven by philosophy.
When Parker or Ginobili or Duncan — or even all three! — get hurt, the Spurs
For a notorious control freak, Chris Paul has looked perilously close to losing command of his emotions in two playoff losses to the Memphis Grizzlies. Last night, Paul threw himself into near-hysterics over an official’s failure to give him a call on an obvious flop.
At that point in the 3rd quarter, the Grizzlies were comprehensively demolishing the Clippers. After battering the Clippers in the paint throughout the game, the Grizzlies led 73-51. Then, in the span of 80 seconds of game time that felt like about 10 minutes in real time, Paul, Caron Butler and Mo Williams were each whistled for a technical foul, every one for complaining to the officials.
Fast forward to 6:13 seconds left in the game (:55 left), and the Grizzlies are clinging to a six-point lead. Bet the Clips wish they could have those technical freethrows back, right?
You know what would have helped LA’s comeback? Not getting five technicals.
— John Hollinger (@johnhollinger) May 10, 2012
Mr. Hollinger’s point is well taken, it’s stupid to give up free points of any kind. This is especially true when they come, essentially, from being a bunch of complainers.
But I’m not so sure the Clippers would have even been in this one without that weird burst of technicals in the third quarter.
Paul’s tantrum reminded me of another great athlete who used his mind as much as his physical ability to upend his opponents: John McEnroe.
McEnroe, along with a few others of his generation, was famous for arguing calls at great length, earning single point penalties and other minor infractions (though sometimes things escalated), in an effort not to win that specific point, but to change the emotional atmosphere of the match.
He would stalk the baseline, screaming at his opponent, the
Some adjustments to look for in the playoff games tonight.
Memphis Grizzlies (0-1) versus Los Angeles Clippers (1-0)
Even with out The Comeback, that might have been the most complete basketball game Blake Griffin has played as a pro. There weren’t any eye-popping numbers, but Griffin buckled down and did all the gritty things that helps teams win in the playoffs. Routinely (and rightly) criticized for defensive effort and performance, Griffin was very solid (especially in the second half) at that end Sunday night.
He battled Memphis bigs all game for post positioning, communicated and rotated effectively on defense. Griffin even switched out on a late pick-and-roll and forced OJ Mayo into a tough shot in the middle of the Clippers’ memorable run. Of course there were a few dunks, but there was no show-boating, no taunting, just a quiet, tough performance that got him something more important than a few highlight reel clips; a win in Memphis. If the “other” L.A. team wants to put a stranglehold on this series, they will need more of that from him tonight.
San Antonio Spurs (1-0) vs. Utah Jazz (0-1)
Playoff underdogs walk a fine line. On one hand, a team should always play to their strengths, but on the other, a team needs to adjust their identity at times in order to create problems or keep up with a more talented opponent. Ty Corbin, coaching in his first postseason, is trying to find where that line is.
To find it, he may want to examine his use of backup point guard Jamaal Tinsley. In Game 1, Corbin stuck to what seems to be his most recent rotation pattern, leaving Tinsley in for quite a long stretch in the second quarter. At the 10:03 mark in that period, Tony Parker re-entered the game for San Antonio and the Spurs promptly scored on 8 of
Blake Griffin embarrassed Pau Gasol.
I mean Pau should have been blushing something fierce from the shame of being dunked on as badly as he was. It was one of those moments in which your manhood is question, your rigidity is nonexistent and you can’t be considered a great basketball player because your softness makes Charmin look like blood diamonds. Not only did it happen right away to start off the game and set the tone for the evening, but it also happened again later as well. Continue reading “The real embarrassment of last night” »
Please excuse me while I remove my journo-blogger vintage sport coat and hat. Now just give me a second to change into my replica and not at all childish home-alternate Shawn Kemp jersey. It’s going to be difficult typing the rest of this with a foam finger on my hand, but bear with me—it’s fan time.
A caveat: this post has nothing to do with how good this team is, or can be. This post couldn’t care less about efficient scoring and can’t even spell utilitarenism. This post is about one thing: why I can’t stand the Clippers.
Let’s start back in December. Like everyone else on planet basketball, I was thrilled when Chris Paul was assigned by David Stern to play for the Los Angeles Clippers. Lob City, baby! A Slamstravaganza the likes of which we’ve never seen!
What could be better than the guard I find most aesthetically pleasing wielding implements as potent and dunky as Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan? It was going to be magic, it was going to be the feel good story of the year. (We didn’t know who Jeremy Lin was, or if we did we didn’t care.) Chris Paul would be on national TV all year, Blake Griffin would take that next step forward under Paul’s wing (I even predicted Blake would get more MVP votes than Kevin Durant…) and The Gentleman Chauncey would round out a cast of guys we like to root for.
But like a big piece Double Bubble, the Clippers’ initial sweetness soon departed and for the past few weeks I’ve been trying to pretend that I enjoy the basketball version of chewing on a flavorless wad of gum that any second threatens to choke me on my own saliva.
It starts with you, Blake Griffin.
For my next trick, the Clippers in the Finals
Chris Paul is a wizard, a magician, they say. And those who describe him that way are correct, not in that Paul possesses the ability to effect supernatural phenomenon upon this mundane plane of existence, but that he can make us think his tricks and sleight of hand exceed the bounds of logic. But when we peek behind the curtain, we can see that what makes Chris Paul so powerful isn’t a familiarity with the occult, but a practical mastery of the minutia of the pick-and-roll. That, and an shaman’s handle.
The two most productive offenses in the league belong to Miami and Denver, two teams that push the pace and generate steals and easy shots in transition. These teams create advantages in the open court, either by having more players than the defense or by putting great finishers in situations without help defense.
The third best offense belongs to the Clippers, who play at a much slower pace and rank in the bottom third in transition points. That the Clippers are able to be so efficient without a prolific fastbreak attack is impressive. That they do it without a ton of three point shooters or ever really running set plays is indeed phenomenal.
A quick look at league-wide field goal percentage confirms that in a 5-on-5 situation, NBA defenses have an advantage over just about any NBA offense. The reason teams run screen and rolls, back picks or flex cuts is to force the defense to think, to react, and to hopefully surrender that advantage by allowing an avenue to an easy shot.
What makes the Clipper half court offense so consistently productive is that when Chris Paul runs a regular old pick-and-roll, he is the very best
With the game on the line, Chris Paul broke LeBron James’s ankles with a skidding pull-back crossover that appeared for all the world to set up Paul’s patented 18-foot fallaway. After eviscerating the Heat defense for four quarters, Paul did what not even Derrick Rose could do when, instead of shooting off his crossover, he glanced at the rim, set his feet and pushed the ball forward and past the lunging James. At one point the two players were moving at full speed in opposite directions–this is the definition of breaking down a defender.
(scroll to about 2:15 for the play)
Paul’s mastery of the moment stood in stark contrast what transpired 24 hours earlier when Monta Ellis awkwardly maneuvered about the 3-point line before tossing a half-hearted pass to a teammate standing four feet away as the final buzzer sounded. Except, in effect, the same exact thing happen. Check the replay, and you’ll see that for all his shaking, baking and ankle breaking, Paul didn’t get off his 12 foot floater before the red backboard light went off.
When LeBron lunged to block the shot Chris Paul never took, Twitter exploded like the crowd at an And 1 mixtape game after a someone bounces the ball of his defender’s head then just throws the it into the stands. But that embarrassing lunge kept Paul from getting a shot off and kept the Heat in the game.
Not sure this exonerates James, but the play-by-play will tell you that the Clippers failed to get a shot off after inbounding the ball with 5 seconds and change left in a tie game.
Chris Paul is a Los Angeles Clipper. Suddenly, the Clippers relevant, exciting, and a potential threat to win the Western Conference. Pretty much everyone believes Chris Paul is and will be fantastic. Still, some wonder if he’s already on the gradual down slope of his career. But Clippers fans should take heart: the numbers suggest Paul is headed for a big year.
The 2007-08 and 2008-09 seasons are the finest of Paul’s career to date– virtuoso performances that stack up with the best by a point guard in the last 25 years. So why the downward trend in the year since? Well, besides an injury riddled 2009-10 season, a change in personnel – including losing Tyson Chandler – significantly impacted Paul’s game.
Chandler, at the time, was the perfect running mate for Paul, his Amar’e to Paul’s Steve Nash.
According to HoopData, in the ’08 and ’09 seasons (when he led the NBA in assist percentage at well over 50%), Paul was dolling out approximately 4.5 assists per-40 minutes that led to points at the rim. In the years since Chandler’s departure, those marks have dropped to 3.5, while the number of assists leading to mid-range jumpers has climbed significantly.
None of this should be surprising given that the Hornets replaced a 7-foot pick-and-roll nightmare with Emeka Okafur and used David West primarily as a pick-and-pop target.
Last year, the Hornets ranked 29th in the NBA in shot attempts at the rim and shot 64% on those opportunities. The Clippers, on the other hand, attempted the 4th most shots at the rim and made greater than 65% of these–all with Baron Davis and Mo Williams running the show.
Another reason for the tangible and perceived drop-off in Paul’s production has to do with how the burden to create
David Stern is quite the moving target these days. If he does anything untoward, people lament how the “owners pushed him into it,” how “the old David wouldn’t have caved.” Oh, if only they’d let DS do him!
While not privy to secrets, I tend to buy that David Stern does what he wants. He’s famously headstrong, to his credit in many instances. The CBA is signed, Stern’s inching towards retirement, why would he be at the mercy of others? Why not give him the dignity of owning his power?
But even after you give David agency, he shimmies away from indictment like a salsa dancing diplomat–with full immunity and full maracas. A commissioner’s job is broadly defined, and if you rip Stern for failure in one aspect, you’re bound to hear that his real job is devoted to serving another realm.
Look you naive sap, Stern’s real job is to serve BRI hors d’oeuvres at the NBA owner cocktail social. Basketball’s popularity means little to this platter-wielding bowtie.
Eventually, it all devolves into basketball geeks attempting to out-savvy each other, each one yawning louder and longer before unveiling the “real” realpolitik behind David Stern’s micro management of macro situations. I have heard a similar logic line in response to recent CP3 events.
Yo, naive sap, Stern’s real job is to sell the Hornets to some swollen-pocketed yokel. He’s stripping the bark off the team, PR means little to him.
I can believe that a team sale is a consideration here, and perhaps the main attribution considering the Rockets-Lakers trade price tag. I repeat: I can believe this. It is just as likely that Stern merely wants to punish Chris Paul for flouting the spirit of this new CBA, or that Stern dislikes the optics of a